Terms of Service
New documents published by Project Veritas claim that White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci directly funded controversial research into bat coronaviruses in China. Fauci has previously denied this.
You need to sign in before you can leave a comment.
watch from the 29:30 mark... he stated very clearly that they were inserting the spike protein into SARS at the wuhan lab. game over end of story. bats just dont get aids all of a sudden and you can tell from the other doctor that its common knowledge that they insert the aids spike protein in order to "work on corona viruses". https://youtu.be/IdYDL_RK--w?t=1782
Vincent speaks with Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance, a global nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting wildlife and public health from the emergence of disease.
IMHO They are dancing around the furin site because the only time they really see it is when they have genetically inserted the spike protein in a lab setting to steer/manipulate corona virus and its common knowledge as seen in the other doctors reaction in the vid above.... they have been putting the spike protein into sars for years and this means that basically most virologist know at one glance that it was a lab leak and they keep their mouths shut to keep the grants coming.
and hence the next section... they know.
How did they insert it into SARS if SARS has never been purified/isolated?
Not saying the lab technicians weren't trying things but I still believe this is the wrong tree and that Wuhan/NIH is all just a big charade for money laundering.
I lean toward Leni's viewpoint. Virology is sham science. But if they nail Fauci for funding this sham research I say great.
It could also be that they didn't want to release a static version to the world. if they handed the real one then you get what we got at the start of this.... virologists screaming that its a lab made chimera.. and if they release more natural looking one then i think experts would know that it was not capable of what is being seen and they would be called on it. If you remember the very early stages then you will remember that one of the doctors intervened a way of washing the virus again and again through animals until the genetic work was smoothed out.... They only release small sections (as admitted to me by the head government lab in queensland) to be matched against. I get that there are people that think that viruses dont exists etc... and anything will be dismissed if it assumes that viruses do. Im not hear to judge.
I'm happy to hold a different belief in regards to viruses, what they are, their existence, etc.
Here's my query though.
If the virus exists, how can you tell that you've got it? PCR?? We know PCR is garbage and shouldn't be used for diagnosis.
So therefore you're left with symptoms, which makes sense. Afterall, there seems to be little to no hard evidence of "asymptomatic transmission" ever occurring, anywhere in the world.
We know for a fact BOTH deaths and cases are hugely inflated due to the PCR scam. So therefore the seriousness is blown way out of proportion. Either that or 'transmission' really does occur really easily and it doesn't effect most people.
But if you 'catch' Covid and have zero symptoms, how is that any different to not catching anything?
Or if Covid really is as bad and dangerous as something created in a lab could be, then why is it that the IFR is so low?
In terms of general 'viruses', why is it that people can be in the vicinity of others who do have symptoms but do not 'catch' the virus. E.g. a chicken pox party. Not every child 'catches' the pox. Some do, some don't. Even if 'contagion' does occur, there is clearly a strong limitation to it.
All the power is being given to the virus and none to external factors relating to whether someone 'catches' it or not.
The same goes with 'airborne' viruses. People can be in the same place as someone with a cold or flu, yet not everyone 'catches' the cold or flu. If it's simply those who believe they will catch it catch it, then this is a fear psychological issue which is causing dis-ease and not any form of 'catching' anything. If it is something deeper, some other form of bodily communication, like when women in the same house have their menstrual cycles align, then again, it's still not 'catching' but there is some form of empathic communication going on. There are things we clearly don't know either way.
well the first version they apparently had was designed as a spray. they were going to spray a concoction on mammals (bats). So It could be actually something they are spraying like weed killer or even putting in food for all we know. we do know that deaths are down world wide and yet if you watch any msm they are screaming from the roof tops. We also know that the passports and totalitarian system was one of the things they planned to get out of all of this. so far all tests that they offer are not fit for purpose and everything else about the cause is sniffled, blocked, marred by patient and intellectual property claims... So, all we really know is that they are lying about everything and its all pre planned.
I don't think kids who catch chickenpox are experiencing mass hysteria. It's not psychological. But chickenpox seems to be a conditioning illness. It is generally harmless and strengthens the immune system.
The virus triggers a reaction, but that is not necessarily causation. The reaction may have been waiting to happen, and simply needed the trigger.
This concept can explain why viral illnesses generally are your body's way of purging toxicity. The toxicity is the true cause of the disease, the virus merely a helpful trigger.
Upon reflection, there may be a psychological element to this process, which determines whether or not the trigger is pulled.
For example an 'outbreak' occurs at a school where a much loved teacher leaves. The children are all sad because they miss their teacher and become "thin skinned" as a result. And then when they recover via say a new fun teacher earning their favour, the healing process begins and to gain the thickening of the skin, the pox reaction occurs.
Haha nice example
I just heard something which I've added to my knowledge bank and that is that inflammation is a good thing (to a degree). Chronic inflammation is heavily associated with death but mild inflammation is good for building and recovery. I never thought of it that way but it's true.
If you get a knock and that part of your body swells as a result, it's not doing it because it's trying to die, it's doing it because it's trying to adapt and recover. Similarly if you go to the gym and work your muscles, you get muscle pain, which is a form of inflammation. As long as the right emotional state is in place, the right nutrients and water then the inflammation will be no issue and will help you heal and grow stronger.
So when we get skin inflammation and we call it pox, it seems to me as though we are experiencing the recovery stage of something.