Was the heart the target all along? Or was that the path to the brain?
21 Apr '22 06:46:089
So, I've been thinking recently. And there's only one place I want to ever share my 'you heard it first, here' thoughts/predictions and that's obviously here at fifthestatepress, due to the integrity, wisdom, rationality, openness to alternative views, etc. of the members.
I first started typing this as a post, claiming I don't have the time these days to neaten it up properly, etc. to share as a Story and so then I just started babbling on. But when I finished my rant after.... 30mins? of typing and saw it was over 5k words, I decided to turn it into the most unprofessional looking story in a while. My apologies! I'm just not enthused enough or have enough spare time to neaten it up and look like a real journalist.
WHAT WE KNOW:
The jabs cause heart inflammation. It's on record. It's even getting mentions in more mainstream programming now. But why?
It seems to be getting discussed in a manner to fob it off as 'normal' and that these heart issues existed all along and that conspiracy theorists are just creating false correlations. To some degree, that unfortunately could be true, which is why it's so important to never just share things willy nilly and make outrageous assumptions and statements without checking the validity first. Regardless of how dismissive it's made out to be, we know, undeniably that the jabs can cause heart issues. Was this known all along? My guess is that the pieces of shit who created these jabs did indeed know exactly what they were doing (now, that's a wild, outrageous claim, so please, don't anybody share it as fact, it's just my best guess).
I've just been looking at the bigger picture and I'm not sure if the sanctions in Russia are partly to create shortages in fertilisers globally, which in turn makes the cost of feeding livestock go up, which then makes meat prices go up.
Does China's lockdown effect the meat industry some how? The do buy massive meat imports do they not? And with them locked down, does that mean that demand for international meat (like from Australia) drops considerably, potentially putting meat producers at a heavy loss, coupled with increasing costs? I'm just throwing ideas around with this and would like some feedback.
But what we do know is that one of the 'sustainable development' goals and the WEF 'Great Reset' goals is to greatly reduce meat consumption. Over the past what 30 years there has been a big push, stating that dietary cholesterol causes heart disease. Now, I fell for this, hook, line and sinker. Part of the reason was because I was listening to a lot of healthy people and a lot of health experts who seemed to be getting it right, who were all towing the same line. People like John McDougall, Doug Graham, Joel Fuhrman, etc. These people I don't want to discredit them because I still believe their work has a lot of credibility, however these days I think their work is incomplete science and also based on false science to begin with. Like The China Study, a book I have and have read at least part of. I can't remember if I read all of it. But it's easy to fall into a trap when the 'science' seems to make sense and 'the science' showed that cholesterol was bad and that dietary cholesterol only comes from animal products...
So the point is... If you can inject people with a product which causes heart issues, you can then turn around to those people and declare a heart health emergency later on but blame it on the over consumption of animal products. And won't it be a lot easier to convince the people to switch when prices have already sky rocketed?
And at the very same time you have environmentalists / climate change garbage 'science' stating that we need to reduce meat consumption to reduce carbon emissions. And if people don't go along with it, we'll just have to have climate lockdowns, etc. How convenient.
The beauty of getting people off animal products? First, I just want to say I still believe carbohydrates are essential, particularly for brain function. Keto dieters claim the brain runs better off fat but I don't see any evidence to agree with this. It seems like carbohydrates are the brains natural energy source and to force it to function off fat seems a tad too unnatural to me. I also think there is evidence to suggest foods like potatoes have played an integral part in the evolution of man. However, fats are also essential for brain health and for cell protection in general. It seems as though what we refer to as Omega 3's are one of the most important parts in brain development and sustainability. But the type of Omega 3's required are found mostly in animal products (including human breast milk). Theoretically you can get some from linseeds/flaxseeds, chia seeds and walnuts, however it's believed these are not optimal sources and many people's bodies cannot do the necessary conversion from one type of Omega 3 which is present in these plant foods to the other form which the brain uses. It's possible that the issue is the way these seeds and nuts are eaten. E.g. cracking a walnut from the shell and eating it fresh, possibly soaking it in water for a few hours first to remove the enzyme inhibitors may be what is required but most people don't know about this and those who do won't go to that extent to eat a walnut. So the point I'm making is that without animal foods, such as oily fish, grass fed lamb, free range eggs, grass fed butter, etc. people will not get essential fats for optimal brain function after they are weaned off the breast (if the child is fortunate enough that their mother hasn't been convinced that bottle feeding is just as good and easier).
Without these fats, the population will remain and become less intelligent and therefore even easier to control. In addition, there is much evidence to suggest that certain protein replacements, such as soy protein, have hormone altering effects, particularly on males. And part of this effect is reducing the things that make them masculine (or toxic masculinity anyone?). Reducing masculinity in a population also reduces resistance to totalitarian style rule. See the video 'Say No to Soycialism' by Daniel Natal for info on this - https://thenewamerican.com/say-no-to-soycialism/
Sorry to end the discussion there. This isn't really a post I've made to educate people, it's more of an idea to share around and to get people thinking and coming up with their own theories, etc. More of a joining the dots attempt. Is my dot joining plausibly accurate?
I feel like I need to add these thoughts to this story as well:
Episode 266: GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE: ‘MY FINAL CALL’
Fifth Estate Press
Very serious implications in comments. i’ve been watching this and I’m almost convinced that Vanden Bossche is either a planted agent to come across as though he’s looking out for humanity OR he has former colleagues at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation feeding him BS that he truly believes... N…
TheRev: "I've been thinking recently"
Well, as a hard-working family man, how come you are not complaining about having NO TIME TO THINK?
(As a long-time Dylan aficionado, I can't help myself)
https://youtu.be/ommCRso46_Q <-- the song (1978)
https://youtu.be/kfYlIINtCo4 <-- lyrical review by another baby-boomer
I've just commented on your first sentence.
OK - I've now read your whole dissertation. Took only 10 minutes of my time, and that included some pauses for thought. I actually have a lot of time to think these days, and I probably think too much.
That reminds me of another quote!
“Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous”
- William Shakespeare, in Julius Caesar
Now I will concentrate on the substantive issue you raise with this public expression of your unbridled thoughts.
----------------------------------------------
I've only a couple observations, to give you some feedback as requested.
Your obvious extensive knowledge in healthy diet and alternative medicine does not interest me. I just rely on common-sense when it comes to diet and exercise.
TheRev: "I'm just throwing ideas around with this and would like some feedback."
Any mind-controlled ordinary reasonable person, triple-vaxxed & still paranoid about catching omicron, reading your dissertation would, more likely than not, think: "this guy is a conspiracy theorist, therefore nothing he or she says is credible. Their mind is a product of misinformation & disinformation from the internet".
And so they will go on their merry way, fearful to even THINK about your speculation.
That's how the government response around the world, through constant, daily, repetitive fear-mongering (and consequent implementation of unprecedented social controls for an infection not much more lethal than a common cold or the 'flu) - that is how they have got ordinary people to stop THINKING.
These people, even if they have TIME TO THINK, would spend all that time listening to mainstream media television and radio narrative until it becomes "received truth" in their brain.
What you are doing here is actually creating HYPOTHESES in order to try an make sense of what is going on and coming down.
What you are doing is actually the scientific method. The need to develop hypotheses comes about in a person who does not understand the government narrative (or rather, it does not make a lot of sense to them).
The hypotheses you develop remain open until they have been falsified with empirical evidence. Conversely, the hypotheses become redundant if the abovementioned "received truth" gets proven - beyond reasonable doubt - with hard evidence. The government narrative becomes the "null hypothesis" if you like.
So, to my way of thinking, you are not a "conspiracy theorist". That is an ad hominem designed to stop people thinking. You are a THINKER. This has resulted in speculation about reasons that better explain what is happening in the world. Provide you present these speculations as hypotheses and not fact, then these are beneficial to society, because they can mitigate against mass formation psychosis that is happening around the world in relation to the threat of the Wuhan flu. The fear-mongering is to drive the whole population into the arms of Big Pharma and Big Government. Oh, and Big Tech as a result of the social control by means of electronic devices and certificates.
The coming heart health emergency.
The Rev: "So the point is... if you can inject people with a product which causes heart issues . . you can then turn around to those people and declare a heart health emergency later on but blame it on . . . . . . "
Now I too "have been thinking recently" about this. But I have a different hypothesis about what the future "heart health emergency" will be blamed on.
Firstly, it is a "no-brainer" (in my brain at least) that the future cause of mass cardiac problems will be the mass mRNA spike protein manufacturing injection program. We can both agree on that one.
But what will this future "heart health emergency" actually be blamed on?
Here's where we have circumstantial evidence that suggests that Big Pharma and and public health authorities including the World Health Organization do in fact have something up their sleeves to explain their forecasted "future mass heart health pandemic".
You guessed it. They will blame it on Covid and not the mRNA vaccines.
Because they have sold the notion of "asymptomatic transmission" of the 2019 Wuhan virus and its "variants", then nobody, but nobody who experiences future heart health problems can say "but I've never had Covid".
I've attached the relevant clipping from a New Zealand local newspaper, the Horowhenua Chronicle, March 4, 2022. I just happened to see it in a supermarket. I believe this story is "planted" in a small country-town local paper and not repeated in the mainstream news reports.
Headline: EXPERT WARNS OF A 'TSUNAMI' OF CASES
Sub-heading: HEART SPECIALIST FEARS COVID WILL LEAD TO HEART DISEASE AND STROKES
Leading paragraphs: A top heart specialist is warning we face a "tsunami" of long Covid after the Omicron outbreak subsides, with a tidal wave of heart disease and strokes and myriad of other debilitating symptoms. Cardiologist Professor Harvey White fears New Zealanders are too blazė about the risk of Omicron infection, which has been painted as mild for most people.
I've copied the clipping below just in case you think I'm making this up.
I like the word "painted" they used.
What is being "painted" in this article? It is a pre-emptive counter-narrative planted by the public health officials and Big Pharma to protect them from accountability for the coming "tsunami" of vaccine-induced heart health problems.
It is ingenious.
Let's wait and see. . .
'Say No to Soycialism' by Daniel Natal <-- he's great, thanks for posting
Great point. The whole article is a great point and I totally agree. Thanks heaps.
"So the point is... If you can inject people with a product which causes heart issues, you can then turn around to those people and declare a heart health emergency later on but blame it on the over consumption of animal products. And won't it be a lot easier to convince the people to switch when prices have already sky rocketed?"
It's always very difficult when you have an epiphany moment or a brain wave and then you are faced with connecting the dots to support what you believe to be true. I am a shocker at trying to help people understand at what I am trying to explain and most times just plant the seed and move on. You have definitely connected the dots in the plan to decrease meat consumption. Just ask your average sheep or beef farmer how every year there is govt bureaucratic interference in farming practices or the Animals Australia MSM assault on people's consciences by convincing Australians that all farmers are guilty of animal cruelty. These are subtle, slow but sure ways of reducing people's protein intake by attacking and isolating the protein producer. The farmer. Reduce the protein intake and we finish up with over feminized males incapable of
...that would be incapable of any leadership qualities and non resistant to any perceived danger. .eg..network news readers and other MSM journalists if they're not f/able females.
Just in case you're not aware, there is also an edit button.
I don't mind your response going across two comments but just in case you didn't know, you can always hit that edit button after accidentally posting a reply and then put it all as one ;)
Max said "It's always very difficult when you have an epiphany moment . . . ."
You make a good point about knowledge gained by this thing called "intuition". Some people can gain their belief about some issue using this almost subconscious and personal way of direct perception into the cause of complex phenomenon. The dictionary definition of the word "intuition":-
noun
direct perception of truth, fact, etc., independent of any reasoning process; immediate apprehension.
* a fact, truth, etc., perceived in this way.
* a keen and quick insight.
* the quality or ability of having such direct perception or quick insight.
* Philosophy: an immediate cognition of an object not inferred or determined by a previous cognition of the same object.
any object or truth so discerned.
* pure, untaught, non-inferential knowledge.
An example I often use is the situation of a young thinker whose parents are Jewish and who is living in 1934 Germany. Through a kind of intuition verging on paranoia, he believes that a holocaust is brewing. His parents are carrying on with business as usual. Based on all the information they were receiving from mainstream media, their son's paranoia was seen as based on misinformation or disinformation.
The same phenomena seems to be happening with this Wuhan virus paranoia. These dark speculations and hypotheses that many of us develop through intuition are dismissed by the government and mainstream media as resulting from "misinformation and disinformation" and described as "conspiracy theories".
The lesson from history is that the German Jewish boy in 1934 - not as educated as his parents - whose fears only arose from "intuition" (or a "gut feel") was proven by history to be horribly correct. He ran away from Germany and entered France. His parents - older and wiser than their son - stayed behind clinging to their stoicism and ingrained optimism. They only woke up when it was too late, and they found themselves arrested and packed into a crowded cattle train headed to Auschwitz . . . .
The moral of this story is that the only way we have to know the future is through intuition.
"Misinformation" and "disinformation" are irrelevant concepts when it comes to belief about the future.
